Activity
From Jul 09, 2020 to Aug 07, 2020
Aug 07, 2020
- 
  09:48 AM Bug #19730: LME areas interpreted somehow as GFCM areas 
- I concur and I created this ticket https://support.d4science.org/issues/19744
 So, unless other aspects, I guess this...
- 
  09:47 AM Bug #19744 (New): GFCM areas vs FAO areas 
- Dear @merul.patel@sustainablefish.org and @susana.segurado@sustainablefish.org 
 Please note this screenshot made i...
Aug 06, 2020
- 
  03:29 PM Bug #19730: LME areas interpreted somehow as GFCM areas 
- Attached you'll find the records that have been updated. As you see we've updated also records having GFCM areas as w...
- 
  03:01 PM Bug #19730: LME areas interpreted somehow as GFCM areas 
- with many thanks!
 regarding the total number "30":
 I checked through the catalogue and tags, and I see we have ...
- 
  02:24 PM Bug #19730 (Feedback): LME areas interpreted somehow as GFCM areas 
- The water areas have been updated and are properly distinguished.
 Moreover, the affected records have been updated...
- 
  10:44 AM Bug #19730: LME areas interpreted somehow as GFCM areas 
- with many thanks, indeed it is important to specify the codesystem as a pure numerical code could belong to different...
- 
  10:33 AM Bug #19730 (In Progress): LME areas interpreted somehow as GFCM areas 
- Thanks for spotting this. 
 This occurs because the URI that is assigned for the identifier is the same for both Code...
Aug 04, 2020
- 
  10:48 AM Bug #19730 (Closed): LME areas interpreted somehow as GFCM areas 
- There are some records in FIRMS for which the assessment area is based on LME code system (e.g. LME 6 <fi:ForeignID C...
Also available in: Atom
 
  
  