Activity
From Sep 13, 2018 to Oct 12, 2018
Oct 05, 2018
-
02:06 PM Bug #12261: Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- Yannis Marketakis wrote:
> @francesco.mangiacrapa@isti.cnr.it they were omitted during the publication of GRSF recor... -
01:43 PM Bug #12261: Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- @francesco.mangiacrapa@isti.cnr.it they were omitted during the publication of GRSF records (as they should), so you ...
Oct 04, 2018
-
- By clicking on Citation facility the string: [Date accessed and/or downloaded] in the Citation" field of a GRSF recor...
-
- Hi @marketak@ics.forth.gr,
In order to make available Assessment IDs also for GRSF records, I didn't understand if...
Oct 01, 2018
-
11:30 AM Bug #12261: Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- Either the two options are fine, indeed as separate field might be better but for now also in the same field is fine,...
-
- Thanks @aureliano.gentile@fao.org
This is exactly what I described. Assessment IDs are valuable for the legacy re...
Sep 30, 2018
-
- I think Yannis wants to say that the AssessmentID(s) (and the reporting years) are available in the source legacy rec...
Sep 29, 2018
-
05:06 PM Bug #12261: Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- @marketak@ics.forth.gr, i am not sure to understand your explanation.
Are you saying that we should combine the inf...
Sep 28, 2018
-
- The assessment IDs are published for the legacy records. So, for the record http://data.d4science.org/ctlg/GRSF_Admin...
Sep 26, 2018
-
- Sorry for my late reply.
Reading the above comments I understood that assessment ID should be contained in the tim...
Sep 24, 2018
-
- Please @francesco.mangiacrapa@isti.cnr.it clarify the issue about the visibility of the assessment id.
Sep 18, 2018
-
03:25 PM Bug #12417: Associated data are not returned
- Of course, you can find the record here http://data.d4science.org/ctlg/GRSF_Admin/9d81aa77-1fba-3804-b3f9-d4514d6705dc
-
- The item has been successfully recreated, sorry for the inconvenience caused.
Sep 14, 2018
-
-
- yes, it makes sense. I just checked this approved record http://data.d4science.org/ctlg/GRSF_Admin/c58637dd-3a63-3e54...
-
- Looking at the code I noticed the following comment:
~~~
// if the record isn't approved, then remove also archiv... -
- The message has been changed.
-
- I have found the issue. I opened the bug #12476 to solve it.
-
- Thanks, @marketak@ics.forth.gr for your feedback. I'm going to investigate the logs.
-
- I just tried to republish the record but it seems that the resources are not yet available. I tried: (1) updating the...
-
- No worries @luca.frosini@isti.cnr.it
I will re-publish it right away.
Sep 13, 2018
-
- @marketak@ics.forth.gr sorry for the misunderstanding. I just tried to publish the record in dev and the Resources ar...
-
- @francesco.mangiacrapa@isti.cnr.it of course!
-
- Hi Yannis,
thank you for clarifying the situation.
Probably the problem (the missing resources) was caused by a ... -
- with thanks
-
- I just changed the name of the button from "Cite this" to "Citation" and his hover at "GRSF Record Citation". I'm goi...
-
- Thanks, the functionality looks good to me.
Indeed the content of the citation needs to be updated as per clarifica... -
-
- "Record" looks fine so far. many thanks
-
- I just added a dedicated CKAN language file for the GRSF Catalogue in order to rename the entity "Item/item" as "Reco...
-
-
- By the comment reported at https://support.d4science.org/issues/10960#note-8
~~~
Item vs Record, we already discu... -
- The aforementioned URL points to " Transform failed: No doc value set for custom tag <transform>"
In any case, we... -
- this url http://firms.fao.org/fi/common/format/popUpCitation.jsp?subSite=FIRMS&url=http%3A//firms.fao.org/firms/resou...
-
- Aureliano Gentile wrote:
> Source citations: RAM has a default one for all records, FIRMS and FishSource have their ...
Also available in: Atom
