Activity
From Mar 22, 2023 to Apr 20, 2023
Apr 20, 2023
-
04:52 PM Task #25004 (New): Area for RAM record SPRATNS
- Dear Arturo,
While checking records in the GRSF, we spotted an inconsistency for the RAM record "SPRATNS" with sem... -
- Dear Yannis,
We have further reviewed the list of FIRMS records still in status "pending" and please could we ask...
Apr 14, 2023
-
04:46 PM Task #24833: Please check if 'exploiting_fishery' property is stil produced by KB
- Yannis Marketakis wrote in #note-6:
> We discussed it together with Aureliano this morning.
> The suggestion is the... -
03:32 PM Task #24816: Change the content of 'refers_to'
- Thanks Luca, we spoke and agreed to adopt all names in full both in "database_sources" and in "refers_to".
-
- See
https://data.d4science.org/ctlg/GRSF_Admin/cb468fb0-fed5-370f-9bc6-08fa99c54f3c -
- The name of the Resources pointing to the referred Records.
![](Screenshot 2023-04-14 at 14-45-33 Records Manageme... -
- Sorry, I do not understand where this will be displayed in the catalogue. Can you help me please?
-
- @marketak@ics.forth.gr @aureliano.gentile@fao.org Which String will you use for `FAO SDG 14.4.1 Questionnaire` referr...
-
- The complete list is:
```json
"database_sources": [
"FishSource",
"Fisheries and Resources Monitoring Syste...
Apr 11, 2023
-
09:16 PM Task #24614: Evaluate to change the polygon approach
- They are 2 different functional requirements expressed here:
* Visualization: visualization the actual geographic ex...
Apr 07, 2023
-
02:17 PM Feature #24608: Add Areas code in the JSON to allow GRSF Publisher to create tags
- The same functionality is also applicable for GRSF fishery records. The new field for fisheries is called `hidden_fis...
-
- A new functionality that includes all the parent areas for a record has been implemented.
As agreed, the extended c...
Mar 27, 2023
-
- Good day Luca, regarding the #note-22, as long these are single examples, yes they can be added in the documentation ...
Mar 24, 2023
-
- We discussed it together with Aureliano this morning.
The suggestion is the following:
* `exploiting_fishery`: This... -
- If it is confusing then we should change the label (from Resources exploited to something else).
In terms of modeling... -
- Hi @luca.frosini@isti.cnr.it
* `grsf_type`: we were using that for stocks and fisheries to define the detailed ty...
Mar 23, 2023
-
- @marketak@ics.forth.gr In the example provided, there is still the following field:
```
"grsf_semantic_name": "Hy... -
- Yannis Marketakis wrote in #note-20:
> Thanks @aureliano.gentile@fao.org for your reply. Let's use the semantic IDs ... -
- yes I see, but that field "Resources Exploited" not sure if it is working well and most important if it is still rele...
-
- Connected records are different from the exploited resources. Their semantics differ.
* we have connected records... -
- Conceptually speaking: a fish stock is exploited by a fishery, but not the contrary. So we have respectevely exploite...
-
- I see that currently, we have fishery records exploiting stock records and not vice versa.
For example, the GRSF f... -
- Looking at the JSON of the records published in June 2021, I didn't find any occurrence of such a property.
Can yo... -
- As agreed with @marketak@ics.forth.gr I'm going to pause this ticket.
I'll ask to change the produced JSON to @mark... -
- I confirm that we will change the objects for the `refers_to` records to show the name of the corresponding source, ...
-
- Aureliano Gentile wrote in #note-13:
> Thank you, all fine with me. The above examples do not cover the 4th source of... -
- Thank you, all fine with me. The above examples do not cover the 4th source of information (FAO SDG 14.4.1 Questionna...
-
- OK let's keep the second approach that is much simpler and less verbose
```json
"database_sources": [
"FishSource...
Mar 22, 2023
-
- I just had a call with @aureliano.gentile@fao.org and we agreed that:
* the generated Resources not only are usele... -
- Hi @luca.frosini@isti.cnr.it,
I replied to #24816 (please check).
Of course we can discuss this (and any other i... -
- @aureliano.gentile@fao.org does the creation of the resource point to the database source which are well know an adde...
-
-
- In any case, I've just realised that this field `database_sources` is fine as it is.
Instead, I have to change the b... -
- @marketak@ics.forth.gr I just realised that you are right. Thanks for highlighting this.
Also the `database_sources`... -
- I have added the image to point you to the resource of FIRMS, not to the FIRMS record (which clearly comes from `refe...
-
- Yannis Marketakis wrote in #note-3:
> We could do that, but I see that the extra information in the json object for d... -
- We could do that, but I see that the extra information in the json object for database sources (i.e. description and ...
-
- I just had a call with @aureliano.gentile@fao.org and for the name of the Resource is fine having the source.
So, ... -
- Yannis Marketakis wrote in #note-6:
> Overall I do not think we have a problem with the solution you initially propo... -
- Overall I do not think we have a problem with the solution you initially proposed, because:
* in GRSF Admin VRE
... -
-
- As I anticipated in #24817 we can't use the source as name for the resource because it clashes with the name of the r...
-
- Hi @luca.frosini@isti.cnr.it .
Your proposal is absolutely fine by me. -
- Thanks @aureliano.gentile@fao.org for your reply. Let's use the semantic IDs then.
@luca.frosini@isti.cnr.it attach... -
- Such a part is created by concatenating the different information in description CKAN field
Also available in: Atom
