Activity
From Feb 24, 2023 to Mar 25, 2023
Mar 24, 2023
-
12:14 PM Task #24833: Please check if 'exploiting_fishery' property is stil produced by KB
- We discussed it together with Aureliano this morning.
The suggestion is the following:
* `exploiting_fishery`: This... -
- If it is confusing then we should change the label (from Resources exploited to something else).
In terms of modeling... -
- Hi @luca.frosini@isti.cnr.it
* `grsf_type`: we were using that for stocks and fisheries to define the detailed ty...
Mar 23, 2023
-
05:17 PM Task #24610: Provide a JSON example for Traceability Unit
- @marketak@ics.forth.gr In the example provided, there is still the following field:
```
"grsf_semantic_name": "Hy... -
- Yannis Marketakis wrote in #note-20:
> Thanks @aureliano.gentile@fao.org for your reply. Let's use the semantic IDs ... -
01:37 PM Task #24833: Please check if 'exploiting_fishery' property is stil produced by KB
- yes I see, but that field "Resources Exploited" not sure if it is working well and most important if it is still rele...
-
- Connected records are different from the exploited resources. Their semantics differ.
* we have connected records... -
- Conceptually speaking: a fish stock is exploited by a fishery, but not the contrary. So we have respectevely exploite...
-
- I see that currently, we have fishery records exploiting stock records and not vice versa.
For example, the GRSF f... -
- Looking at the JSON of the records published in June 2021, I didn't find any occurrence of such a property.
Can yo... -
- As agreed with @marketak@ics.forth.gr I'm going to pause this ticket.
I'll ask to change the produced JSON to @mark... -
- I confirm that we will change the objects for the `refers_to` records to show the name of the corresponding source, ...
-
- Aureliano Gentile wrote in #note-13:
> Thank you, all fine with me. The above examples do not cover the 4th source of... -
- Thank you, all fine with me. The above examples do not cover the 4th source of information (FAO SDG 14.4.1 Questionna...
-
- OK let's keep the second approach that is much simpler and less verbose
```json
"database_sources": [
"FishSource...
Mar 22, 2023
-
- I just had a call with @aureliano.gentile@fao.org and we agreed that:
* the generated Resources not only are usele... -
- Hi @luca.frosini@isti.cnr.it,
I replied to #24816 (please check).
Of course we can discuss this (and any other i... -
- @aureliano.gentile@fao.org does the creation of the resource point to the database source which are well know an adde...
-
-
- In any case, I've just realised that this field `database_sources` is fine as it is.
Instead, I have to change the b... -
- @marketak@ics.forth.gr I just realised that you are right. Thanks for highlighting this.
Also the `database_sources`... -
- I have added the image to point you to the resource of FIRMS, not to the FIRMS record (which clearly comes from `refe...
-
- Yannis Marketakis wrote in #note-3:
> We could do that, but I see that the extra information in the json object for d... -
- We could do that, but I see that the extra information in the json object for database sources (i.e. description and ...
-
- I just had a call with @aureliano.gentile@fao.org and for the name of the Resource is fine having the source.
So, ... -
- Yannis Marketakis wrote in #note-6:
> Overall I do not think we have a problem with the solution you initially propo... -
- Overall I do not think we have a problem with the solution you initially proposed, because:
* in GRSF Admin VRE
... -
-
- As I anticipated in #24817 we can't use the source as name for the resource because it clashes with the name of the r...
-
- Hi @luca.frosini@isti.cnr.it .
Your proposal is absolutely fine by me. -
- Thanks @aureliano.gentile@fao.org for your reply. Let's use the semantic IDs then.
@luca.frosini@isti.cnr.it attach... -
- Such a part is created by concatenating the different information in description CKAN field
Mar 21, 2023
-
- Aureliano Gentile wrote in #note-18:
> yes indeed, the semantic ID might suffice, (and to see all metadata then we w... -
- yes indeed, the semantic ID might suffice, (and to see all metadata then we will click on the uuid). So fine as per y...
-
- @aureliano.gentile@fao.org we have just discussed this with @luca.frosini@isti.cnr.it
We could add a name for the... -
- Thanks, so for question 1 (semantic name, let's see Luca's answer, in case the semantic name should be the one to be ...
-
- Aureliano Gentile wrote in #note-14:
> Dear Yannis, thanks, I spoke with Luca today for a few clarifications, and pl... -
- Dear Yannis, thanks, I spoke with Luca today for a few clarifications, and please I have two questions.
1- GRSF se... -
- @luca.frosini@isti.cnr.it thank you for your comments.
I have updated the JSON representation (attached the v3) and... -
- Luca Frosini wrote in #note-10:
>
> ``` javascript
> "referring_stock_record" : "https://data.d4science.org/ctlg/... -
- @marketak@ics.forth.gr I just remember that @aureliano.gentile@fao.org asked me the following requirements during the...
-
- Stock and Fishery records contain the fields `database_sources`.
As an example, please consider the following the ... -
- Stock and Fishery records contain the fields `refers_to`.
As an example, please consider the following the Stock R...
Mar 20, 2023
-
- According to the wiki at https://support.d4science.org/projects/stocksandfisherieskb/wiki/GRSF_Model-Traceability_Uni...
-
- @marketak@ics.forth.gr I have modified the wiki at https://support.d4science.org/projects/stocksandfisherieskb/wiki/G...
-
- @marketak@ics.forth.gr the example does not contain `grsf_type` field which should has as value the constant "Traceab...
-
- Please find attached an image which clarifies the place where the two pieces of info must be placed, i.e. below the `...
-
- To properly support the request for the new type **Traceability Unit** it is requested to add the following Informati...
-
Mar 17, 2023
-
- Thank you for the prompt reaction.
-
02:17 PM Bug #24795 (Feedback): Server Error message on GRSF_PRE VRE
- Now should be OK: https://i-marine.d4science.org/group/grsf_pre/data-catalogue
-
- After removing the records from GRSF PRE VRE, the following error appears.
...
Mar 16, 2023
-
- Yannis Marketakis wrote in #note-3:
> Sure, I can change them easily.
>
> Just one question: Is this about the n... -
- Sure, I can change them easily.
Just one question: Is this about the new development on supporting publishing trace...
Mar 15, 2023
-
- I'm investigating the feasibility.
The actual analysis is the following:
* I'll improve gcat to support more op...
Mar 02, 2023
-
- with many thanks, it looks great.
Mar 01, 2023
-
- GRSF-API has been updated.
It now reports all the data owners and the DB sources contributing for a GRSF record at ... -
- I have just updated, tested and redeployed the service responsible for managing GRSF records using the GRSF managemen...
Feb 27, 2023
-
- Dear Yannis, thanks, I think the owner and source urls do refer to the record as a whole, while I am referring to eac...
-
05:06 PM Feature #24653: GRSF API does not include reference source for each datum
- Hi both,
Thanks for raising this ticket Aureliano. What I meant was the assessment source reference - so like a li...
Feb 24, 2023
-
- The data owner is retrieved (it is not included in the timeseries group).
Morover, the original record IDs and URLs ... -
- In the time series exposed via GRSF APIs these fields are missing:
db_source
data_owner
while these fields are...
Also available in: Atom
