Activity
From Oct 24, 2018 to Nov 22, 2018
Nov 22, 2018
-
02:25 PM Feature #12278: Complete Citation development
- I just noticed this citation and it says "FAO 2018" https://bluebridge.d4science.org/group/grsf_admin/data-catalogue?...
-
02:23 PM Bug #12906: Update "problematic" records in the GRSF admin catalog
- Sure. Attached you will find the corresponding titles
-
01:55 PM Bug #12906: Update "problematic" records in the GRSF admin catalog
- Thanks, I'll review. Actually with the title next to the URL it would be much easier for me to spot which are assessm...
-
12:29 PM Bug #12906: Update "problematic" records in the GRSF admin catalog
- Attached you will find the list of stocks records that have state and trend info and do not have time-series info.
... -
11:44 AM Bug #12906: Update "problematic" records in the GRSF admin catalog
- One clarification: if the record has status trend indicators then it is an Assessment Unit by default. These status i...
-
11:25 AM Bug #12906: Update "problematic" records in the GRSF admin catalog
- Thank you for the answer. So I will update the type of the record. Would you like to do it for all the records that f...
-
11:20 AM Bug #12906: Update "problematic" records in the GRSF admin catalog
- Thanks, I confirm the overall requirement https://support.d4science.org/projects/stocksandfisherieskb/wiki/GRSF_datab...
-
11:05 AM Bug #12906: Update "problematic" records in the GRSF admin catalog
- @aureliano.gentile@fao.org As regards the record http://data.d4science.org/ctlg/GRSF_Admin/ee1d7967-6da2-3d8a-88d5-c...
-
11:06 AM Task #12856: Verification of GRSF merging process
- Thank you @emmanuel.blondel1@gmail.com .
I will invoke this in the merging process and let you know if we face any p... -
10:59 AM Bug #12419 (Closed): Fishing Pressure time series is missing in several records
-
10:54 AM Bug #12419: Fishing Pressure time series is missing in several records
- The missing time-series have been added into GRSF KB (aprox. 400 were missing).
As a proof of concept we have update...
Nov 21, 2018
-
06:39 PM Task #12856: Verification of GRSF merging process
- Dear @marketak@ics.forth.gr for spatial, see https://support.d4science.org/projects/stocksandfisherieskb/wiki/18-11-1...
-
11:50 AM Bug #12420 (Closed): Narrative text is messed up when in multiple xml nodes
-
11:38 AM Bug #12420: Narrative text is messed up when in multiple xml nodes
- Thanks for your reply @francesco.mangiacrapa@isti.cnr.it .
So, I will replace ';' with whitespace.
Nov 20, 2018
-
04:47 PM Bug #12420: Narrative text is messed up when in multiple xml nodes
- It is (wrongly) correct, I would say ;-)
Anyway, so the best would be to add simply a space.
With thanks -
04:44 PM Bug #12420: Narrative text is messed up when in multiple xml nodes
- Yannis Marketakis wrote:
> I think that we cannot use HTML formatting tags (i.e. `<br>, <i>, <b>`, etc.) for the pro... -
03:44 PM Bug #12420 (Feedback): Narrative text is messed up when in multiple xml nodes
- I think that we cannot use HTML formatting tags (i.e. `<br>, <i>, <b>`, etc.) for the properties of the catalog. @fra...
-
03:18 PM Bug #12420: Narrative text is messed up when in multiple xml nodes
- Thanks a lot!
Actually multiple text nodes are generated by the FIRMS Word-to-XML converter tool for handling differ... -
01:58 PM Bug #12420 (Closed): Narrative text is messed up when in multiple xml nodes
- The issue has been resolved. The narratives for the fields scientific_advice and state_and_trend are concatenated whi...
-
12:34 PM Bug #12906: Update "problematic" records in the GRSF admin catalog
- Practically, if we update a record it will have the same effect with republishing it.
As regards your comment about... -
12:00 PM Bug #12906: Update "problematic" records in the GRSF admin catalog
- It might be good to republish the entire data set to avoid any undetected issues.
In example today I was preparing a... -
09:32 AM Bug #12906 (Closed): Update "problematic" records in the GRSF admin catalog
- Because of the related issues, there are several records that have problems. Once all these problems are resolved, we...
-
09:44 AM Bug #12261 (Closed): Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
-
09:44 AM Bug #12261: Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- The issue has been resolved.
As a proof of concept, I ve updated one GRSF record (http://data.d4science.org/ctlg/... -
09:34 AM Bug #12424 (Closed): Stock status FAO categories not properly handled
- The issue has been resolved.
As a proof of concept I've updated the records in the catalog (http://data.d4science.o...
Nov 19, 2018
-
03:58 PM Bug #12261 (Feedback): Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- The publisher client has been updated.
Whenever there are time-series coming from RAM data source, then instead of t... -
03:49 PM Bug #12424 (In Progress): Stock status FAO categories not properly handled
- OK. Then I suggest to keep the controlled vocabulary for now and we'll see in the future if we want to relax this con...
-
03:45 PM Bug #12424: Stock status FAO categories not properly handled
- The FAO state of a stock is based on a controlled vocabulary, which however it changes across time. The above new ite...
-
03:35 PM Bug #12424: Stock status FAO categories not properly handled
- Aureliano Gentile wrote:
> I thought the categories were transparent to the process and received blindly whatever is... -
03:21 PM Bug #12424: Stock status FAO categories not properly handled
- I thought the categories were transparent to the process and received blindly whatever is in the source databases (le...
-
02:56 PM Bug #12424 (Feedback): Stock status FAO categories not properly handled
- This issue appeared because there were some of the identified categories missing (not fully exploited in this case). ...
Nov 16, 2018
-
03:49 PM Task #12856: Verification of GRSF merging process
- # Merging stocks
## Pre-requisites
* species in the records under merging should be the same. If not the same,... -
01:40 PM Bug #12420: Narrative text is messed up when in multiple xml nodes
- This issue happens because the sequence of the narrative texts was not preserved (it was not defined to do so).
FORT... -
01:34 PM Bug #12419: Fishing Pressure time series is missing in several records
- Clarification:
The first record has two values for Abundance Level, and one for Fishing Pressure.
These values we... -
01:26 PM Bug #12424 (In Progress): Stock status FAO categories not properly handled
- The value in the GRSF KB is correct, so this is an issue appeared during the publishing.
-
01:21 PM Bug #12261 (In Progress): Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- Today we have discussed with FAO, about how to proceed with this issue.
We ended up that the best way to resolve th...
Nov 13, 2018
-
05:01 PM Task #12861 (Closed): Purge old records of the public GRSF Catalogue
- done https://ckan-grsf.d4science.org/group
-
04:36 PM Task #12861: Purge old records of the public GRSF Catalogue
- Yes please do.
Thanks -
03:02 PM Task #12861: Purge old records of the public GRSF Catalogue
- Yannis Marketakis wrote:
> If we remove them they are will be re-created when we publish data. Is that correct?
Y... -
11:41 AM Task #12861: Purge old records of the public GRSF Catalogue
- If we remove them they are will be re-created when we publish data. Is that correct?
Nov 12, 2018
-
05:30 PM Task #12861 (Feedback): Purge old records of the public GRSF Catalogue
- All records have been removed from https://ckan-grsf.d4science.org/
@marketak@ics.forth.gr and @minadakn@ics.forth.g... -
12:35 PM Task #12861 (In Progress): Purge old records of the public GRSF Catalogue
-
11:55 AM Task #12861 (Closed): Purge old records of the public GRSF Catalogue
- We need to remove all records of the public GRSF Catalogue (it's https://ckan-grsf.d4science.org/)
-
12:19 PM Task #12858: Purge old records from public GRSF VRE
- Yannis Marketakis wrote:
> @francesco.mangiacrapa@isti.cnr.it and @luca.frosini@isti.cnr.it could you please remov... -
12:13 PM Task #12858 (In Progress): Purge old records from public GRSF VRE
- @francesco.mangiacrapa@isti.cnr.it and @luca.frosini@isti.cnr.it could you please remove them all from the GRSF VRE ?
-
10:58 AM Task #12858: Purge old records from public GRSF VRE
- Yes, the GRSF VRE shoudl be empty so to receive approved records from the GRSF Admin. (to note the inheriting of thos...
Nov 11, 2018
-
12:28 PM Task #12860 (New): Prepare a press release for GRSF
- Upon the approval of some GRSF records, it is important to have a press release that can be used for further dissemin...
-
12:24 PM Task #12859 (New): Ensure that approved GRSF records are public
- Ensure that the approved GRSF records published in the VRE (https://services.d4science.org/group/grsf/) are publicly ...
-
12:21 PM Task #12858 (Closed): Purge old records from public GRSF VRE
- Currently, there are some records in the GRSF public VRE (https://services.d4science.org/group/grsf/). These are the ...
-
12:17 PM Task #12857 (Closed): Bulk approval of (valid) GRSF records
- FORTH will approve (programmatically) a few records from the GRSF admin. More specifically:
* Assessment units un... -
12:13 PM Task #12856 (Closed): Verification of GRSF merging process
- Before proceeding with the actual merging of GRSF records, it is important to verify how it will be done for each cas...
Also available in: Atom