Activity
From Sep 14, 2018 to Oct 13, 2018
Oct 05, 2018
-
02:06 PM Bug #12261: Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- Yannis Marketakis wrote:
> @francesco.mangiacrapa@isti.cnr.it they were omitted during the publication of GRSF recor... -
01:43 PM Bug #12261: Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- @francesco.mangiacrapa@isti.cnr.it they were omitted during the publication of GRSF records (as they should), so you ...
Oct 04, 2018
-
03:34 PM Feature #10960: GRSF Record citation facility
- By clicking on Citation facility the string: [Date accessed and/or downloaded] in the Citation" field of a GRSF recor...
-
02:52 PM Bug #12261: Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- Hi @marketak@ics.forth.gr,
In order to make available Assessment IDs also for GRSF records, I didn't understand if...
Oct 01, 2018
-
11:30 AM Bug #12261: Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- Either the two options are fine, indeed as separate field might be better but for now also in the same field is fine,...
-
09:14 AM Bug #12261: Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- Thanks @aureliano.gentile@fao.org
This is exactly what I described. Assessment IDs are valuable for the legacy re...
Sep 30, 2018
-
12:03 PM Bug #12261: Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- I think Yannis wants to say that the AssessmentID(s) (and the reporting years) are available in the source legacy rec...
Sep 29, 2018
-
05:06 PM Bug #12261: Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- @marketak@ics.forth.gr, i am not sure to understand your explanation.
Are you saying that we should combine the inf...
Sep 28, 2018
-
12:42 PM Bug #12261: Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- The assessment IDs are published for the legacy records. So, for the record http://data.d4science.org/ctlg/GRSF_Admin...
Sep 26, 2018
-
03:34 PM Bug #12261: Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- Sorry for my late reply.
Reading the above comments I understood that assessment ID should be contained in the tim...
Sep 24, 2018
-
11:36 AM Bug #12261: Multiple time series in GRSF from RAM data
- Please @francesco.mangiacrapa@isti.cnr.it clarify the issue about the visibility of the assessment id.
Sep 18, 2018
-
03:25 PM Bug #12417: Associated data are not returned
- Of course, you can find the record here http://data.d4science.org/ctlg/GRSF_Admin/9d81aa77-1fba-3804-b3f9-d4514d6705dc
-
03:24 PM Bug #12417 (Closed): Associated data are not returned
- The item has been successfully recreated, sorry for the inconvenience caused.
Sep 14, 2018
-
12:11 PM Feature #11752 (Closed): "Archived" is missing among the NEW status values to be selected for GRSF records Admin Panel
-
12:10 PM Feature #11752: "Archived" is missing among the NEW status values to be selected for GRSF records Admin Panel
- yes, it makes sense. I just checked this approved record http://data.d4science.org/ctlg/GRSF_Admin/c58637dd-3a63-3e54...
-
11:47 AM Feature #11752: "Archived" is missing among the NEW status values to be selected for GRSF records Admin Panel
- Looking at the code I noticed the following comment:
~~~
// if the record isn't approved, then remove also archiv... -
12:05 PM Feature #12255 (Closed): Pop-up Text improvement for the locked records
- The message has been changed.
-
10:29 AM Bug #12417: Associated data are not returned
- I have found the issue. I opened the bug #12476 to solve it.
-
09:54 AM Bug #12417: Associated data are not returned
- Thanks, @marketak@ics.forth.gr for your feedback. I'm going to investigate the logs.
-
08:58 AM Bug #12417 (In Progress): Associated data are not returned
- I just tried to republish the record but it seems that the resources are not yet available. I tried: (1) updating the...
-
08:28 AM Bug #12417: Associated data are not returned
- No worries @luca.frosini@isti.cnr.it
I will re-publish it right away.
Also available in: Atom