Task #23492
closed
RAM-FishSource-FIRMS merge
100%
Description
Dear @marketak@ics.forth.gr
Please, we have found two records below that require merging, with the first (RAM/FishSource) record to be the dominant one.
GRSF name: Engraulis encrasicolus - Bay of Biscay (Subarea 27.8)
Short Name: Anchovy ICES VIII
GRSF Semantic Identifier: asfis:ANE+fao:27.8
Record UUID: dcc783b5-ffea-3ede-b1b2-8b65f8ac3c0a
RAM ID: ANCHOBAYB
FishSource ID: 1738
GRSF name: Engraulis encrasicolus - Bay of Biscay (Subarea 27.8)
Short Name: Anchovy - Bay of Biscay
GRSF Semantic Identifier: asfis:ANE+fao:27.8
Record UUID: 53ce460d-b3b0-3fd3-a706-4d9b2a87869f
FIRMS ID: 10457
As these records share the same metadata, we are curious as to why were they not merged or suggested as merging by the system in the recent data harvest?
Updated by Yannis Marketakis almost 3 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
Hi @bracken.vanniekerk@fao.org
When refreshing GRSF, we no longer rely on the GRSF construction workflow, that automatically merges such records.
Instead, we rely on GRSF Refresh workflow, which re-uses existing merging events. In future, I guess we could combine those so that apart from preserving existing merges, it proposes as well new potential mergings.
I'll trigger the aforementioned merging right now.
Updated by Yannis Marketakis almost 3 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
The records are merged.
The resulted (merged) record is https://data.d4science.org/ctlg/GRSF/dcc783b5-ffea-3ede-b1b2-8b65f8ac3c0a
Updated by Bracken van Niekerk almost 3 years ago
Hi @marketak@ics.forth.gr
Thank you kindly for the explanation and for the merging action, all looks good.
@aureliano.gentile@fao.org
