Task #18313
closedApprove-Merge-Annotate GRSF records (RAM vs FishSource)
100%
Description
Please find attached a new round of bulk approvals/merges/annotations for RAM-FishSource records.
Please note a few cases of reject merges and re-merge with other records.
Thanks to @bracken.vanniekerk@fao.org for her work with detailed comments.
Files
Related issues
Updated by Yannis Marketakis over 5 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
Updated by Yannis Marketakis over 5 years ago
- % Done changed from 0 to 10
All annotations have been added.
Updated by Yannis Marketakis about 5 years ago
- % Done changed from 10 to 20
Moved on with records with flag approve. The detailed list with the GRSF public URLs will be uploaded after finishing with all actions.
Updated by Yannis Marketakis about 5 years ago
- % Done changed from 20 to 50
The selected for approval records have been approved .
The records to be merged have been merged (except from one for which the union of their bounding boxes failed). I'll open a new ticket to Emmanuel to clarify what happened.
In the meantime, we are working on approving the newly merged records and on splitting functionality.
Updated by Yannis Marketakis about 5 years ago
- Related to Bug #19017: Error occured while calculating the union of bounding boxes added
Updated by Yannis Marketakis about 5 years ago
- File GRSF_RAM-FishSource_17Dec2019-FORTH.xlsx GRSF_RAM-FishSource_17Dec2019-FORTH.xlsx added
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
- Assignee changed from Yannis Marketakis to Aureliano Gentile
- % Done changed from 50 to 90
All actions mentioned in the XLS file has been carried out.
I've added a new column at the end, with title FORTH - Notes describing the activities carried out.
You are more than welcome to revise them.
Updated by Aureliano Gentile about 5 years ago
- File GRSF_RAM-FishSource_17Dec2019-FORTH_BvN15Apr2020.xlsx GRSF_RAM-FishSource_17Dec2019-FORTH_BvN15Apr2020.xlsx added
Dear Yannis,
Thanks a lot, with @bracken.vanniekerk@fao.org we have checked the records and they are mostly fine.
Please find attached the reviewed Excel file with a few more approvals which where left in pending (no further merges required), and one short name returned with wrong characters while it is fine in the source record in GRSF.
Updated by Yannis Marketakis about 5 years ago
- File GRSF_RAM-FishSource_17Dec2019-FORTH_BvN15Apr2020-FORTH.xlsx GRSF_RAM-FishSource_17Dec2019-FORTH_BvN15Apr2020-FORTH.xlsx added
Carried out the actions reported in the latest XLS file.
You will find it attached.
Updated by Aureliano Gentile about 5 years ago
Thanks Yannis, I made a couple of records check and I understand the changes are already in the GRSF VRE (the public release).
@emmanuel.blondel1@gmail.com : Please, would it be possible to refresh the viewer https://i-marine.d4science.org/web/grsf/map-viewer as we have about 105 new modifications in place?
Updated by Aureliano Gentile about 5 years ago
@marketak@ics.forth.gr please would it be possible to check the sparql query, Emmanuel is trying to update the map viewer but from sparql query we get 1387 stocks + 120 fisheries while the catalogue https://i-marine.d4science.org/web/grsf/data-catalogue indicates:
1385 + 44 = 1429 stocks (assessment unit + marine resource)
110 fishing units
Also some fields are disappeared from the competency query e.g. species (scientific name, common names). An improvement may include the area field as well.
See also attached screenshot.
With thanks
Updated by Yannis Marketakis about 5 years ago
The issue has been resolved. The issue was raised also by the fact that some of the records didn't contain any geographical polygon so they weren't returned through the competency queries.
This is something we've encountered in the past. For these records, you will now see an empty value in the geographical polygon. @emmanuel.blondel1@gmail.com if this causes any issues, please let me know.
Updated by Patrícia Amorim about 5 years ago
- File GRSF_RAM-FishSource_17Dec2019_FSteam_edits.xlsx GRSF_RAM-FishSource_17Dec2019_FSteam_edits.xlsx added
Dear Aureliano,
apologize for the late feedback on the GRSF_RAM_Fishsource associations. I added some comments in column M regarding the approved associations (attaching the file).
We have a question on the standard used for the short name: GRSF short name is not using ASFIS name? For example, northern shrimp is used instead of northern prawn (rows 76-85). Snow crab has been also used instead of Queen crab (rows 96 -108).
Many thanks,
Patricia
Updated by Emmanuel Blondel about 5 years ago
Thanks @marketak@ics.forth.gr no major issue on my side, i've just slightly adapted my script to exclude records with no geographic polygons.
@aureliano.gentile@fao.org I've updated the viewer, here are the current figures in viewer:
- Fisheries: 106 (over 110 returned by Sparql)
- Resources: 1368 (over 1432 returned by Sparql)
Updated by Aureliano Gentile about 5 years ago
Thanks Emmanuel,
Dear @marketak@ics.forth.gr thanks for fixing, but please let me remind you that the species field is no longer returned within the query. Hence the species search option has disappeared from the map viewer.
Would it be possible to restore it? This is the finding between myself and Emmanuel, or are we missing something?
Updated by Yannis Marketakis about 5 years ago
@aureliano.gentile@fao.org species were never part of these queries.
The fields that have been agreed to be used are https://support.d4science.org/projects/stocksandfisherieskb/wiki/19-10-16-GRSF_pilotrelease
Updated by Aureliano Gentile about 5 years ago
Yes, our apologies for the oversight, the point is that the name field was there as search option, then it disappeared recently and we thought was due to the query. Now @emmanuel.blondel1@gmail.com fixed it, actually I understand with some improvements.
Updated by Aureliano Gentile about 4 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed